Showing posts with label Suzuki. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Suzuki. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Suzuki Burgman 650 Exec ABS, 2011


 Suzuki Burgman 650 Exec ABS, 2011
United States of America Specifications
USA MSRP - $9,899 USD

Chassis:
  • Brakes Front Disc brake, twin
  • Brakes Rear Disc brake
  • Color Gray, White
  • Curb Weight 278 kg (613 lbs)
  • Final Drive Gear Drive
  • Fuel Tank Capacity 15.0 L (4.0/3.3 US/Imp gal)
  • Ground Clearance 130 mm (5.1 in)
  • Overall Length 2260 mm (89.0 in)
  • Overall Width 810 mm (31.9 in)
  • Seat Height 750 mm (29.5 in)
  • Suspension Front Telecsopic, coil spring, oil damped
  • Suspension Rear Swingarm type, coil spring, oil damped
  • Tires Front 120/70R15M/C 56H, tubeless
  • Tires Rear 160/60R14M/C 65H, tubeless
  • Transmission SECVT
  • Wheelbase 1595 mm (62.8 in)

Engine:
  • Bore Stroke 75.5 mm (2.972 in) x 71.3 mm (2.807 in)
  • Compression Ratio 11.2 : 1
  • Engine 638 cc (38.9 cu. in), 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, 2-cylinder, DOHC
  • Fuel System Suzuki fuel injection
  • Ignition Electronic ignition (Transistorized)
  • Lubrication Wet sump
  • Starter Electric

Suzuki Burgman 400 ABS, 2011

 

Suzuki Burgman 400 ABS, 2011
United States of America Specifications
USA MSRP - $7,499 USD

Chassis:
  • Brakes Front Disc brake, twin
  • Brakes Rear Disc brake
  • Color White, Gray
  • Curb Weight 222 kg (489 lbs.)
  • Final Drive V-belt drive
  • Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 L (3.6 US gal.)
  • Ground Clearance 125 mm (4.9 in)
  • Overall Length 2270 mm (89.4 in)
  • Overall Width 760 mm (29.9 in)
  • Seat Height 710 mm (28.0 in)
  • Suspension Front Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
  • Suspension Rear Link type, coil spring, oil damped
  • Tires Front 120/80-14 M/C 58S, tubeless
  • Tires Rear 150/70-13 M/C, 64S tubeless
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Wheelbase 1585 mm (62.4 in)
Engine:
  • Bore Stroke 81.0 mm (3.189 in) x 77.6 mm (3.055 in)
  • Compression Ratio 12.5 : 1
  • Engine 400cc, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, single-cylinder, DOHC
  • Fuel System Suzuki fuel injection
  • Ignition Electronic ignition (Transistorized)
  • Lubrication Wet Sump
  • Starter Electric

Suzuki

Suzuki 2012

Suzuki 2011
= Suzuki Burgman 400 ABS
= Suzuki Burgman 650 Exec ABS

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

2008 Suzuki B-King Review


It’s good to be king!


That sums up the first impression the Suzuki B-King made on me, too. It looks like something out of a comic book. Frankly, I expected it to ride that way, too. Big, heavy; all form, no function. Still, it was a bike, and it’s not as though I really get to pick which ones I test, so after the most rudimentary of formalities, I traded Motorcycle.com’s GSX-R600 in for the baddest naked bike around. (Well, it was the baddest when I picked it up, just before Yamaha launched the new V-Max. Until we ride them together we won’t know for sure.)

The Suzuki B-King melds striking styling and brutish power with surprising sophistication.


That cylinder is not the Bat-zooka, Robin; it’s the carbon canister – part of the emissions control. Even though the bike’s ‘naked,’ the new 1340cc Hayabusa-sourced motor is still concealed by all that plumbing and two stout frame spars.

"The bike’s not a laughing stock. Far from it."
Although the B-King’s seat is not particularly high, the bike looked as huge from the vantage point of the saddle as it had when I first walked up to it. Shifting it off the sidestand, it felt heavy too. “Here we go,” I thought “this thing’s going to be a pile.”
The first stop, just a few minutes from Suzuki’s bat-cave, was the Area P dyno room where I’d be meeting up with the MO crew. Even on the short ride, I was already suffering from a little cognitive dissonance because the riding experience was better than I’d expected. But once I met up with Kevin, Pete and Fonzie at Area P, we regaled ourselves at the expense of the B-King’s over-the-top styling. We decided that we’d go for lunch at Burger King, since this bike was such a whopper. Ha, ha. We kill us.
We actually did go to Burger King, and got one of those stupid cardboard crowns they give out with the kid’s menu, and we taped it to my helmet and took some pictures of me riding that way. We laughed some more, imagining the “I’m so hurt you’d mock our bike” calls we’d be getting from Suzuki’s press relations department.
There’s just one catch. The bike’s not a laughing stock. Far from it. Oh, it’s got lots of power, which we all expected. But it’s also got great brakes and frankly amazing handling. It’s comfortable, with the best wind protection I’ve ever experienced without a windscreen, and great ergonomics. I rode 150 miles before the fuel warning flashed on the dash, which is as far as I ever want to ride before stopping to drain my own tank and recaffienate, anyway. No kidding, I could throw soft luggage and a tank bag on this thing and take it sport touring. Or take the mirrors off it, tape over the lights, and take it to a track day.
How the heck did that happen?
Suzuki introduced the 1298cc Hayabusa in 1999. It was the undisputed heavyweight champion in the raw-speed stakes and quickly attracted the interest of horsepower addicts, whether they were racing on the Bonneville Salt Flats in daylight, or on some deserted road in an industrial subdivision after midnight. More than a few of them supercharged their ’Busas, or devised turbocharging or nitrous-injection systems.
In 2001, the motorcycle industry decided to end the top-speed arms race, with a self-imposed 186-mph governor on future models. Only 186? That sort of took the raison d’etre away from the Hayabusa.
Then someone at Suzuki had a brainstorm. What if we took one of those supercharged ’Busa motors and put it in a big naked bike? On the face of it, that was a patently ridiculous notion. Imagine the poor rider, snapping like a flag in the wind, as his arms stretched like rubber bands, hanging onto it for dear life. Still, it was a compelling concept for a show bike, and Suzuki built one for the 2001 Tokyo Motor Show.
That original B-King made an initial impression as huge as its 240-section rear tire. Faced with a global chorus of, “Please, please, please build one like that, that I can buy,” Suzuki set about turning it into reality. The supercharger didn’t make it into the production version (and trust me, it’s not needed) but the rest of the model stayed remarkably close to the original show bike.

The B-King’s design is polarizing, with some of our crew deciding the twin undertail exhaust outlets are simply over the top.

In the interim – perhaps in response to Kawasaki’s impressive ZX-14 – Suzuki stroked the ’Busa motor by two millimeters, boosting displacement to 1340cc. There were a number of other changes including Ti valves and higher compression pistons that added up to a non-trivial increase in power.
That’s the motor that the B-King gets, which is notable in a world where manufacturers often seem to give their naked bikes previous-gen motors. (Obviously, doing so allows them to get more use out of old tooling and to control costs.) The only differences between the ’Busa motor and the B-King’s is that the latter’s underseat exhaust routing is a little more restrictive, it’s airbox is about 15% smaller and doesn’t have a ram-air inlet, and the rev limiter cuts in sooner.

The torque curve – and I use the word loosely – tells the story. The B-King makes more torque at 4,000 rpm than a GSX-R1000 makes at its peak. The ’08 ’Busa’s curves are identical, although horsepower climbs for a few hundred more revs, then there’s another grand available in overrun.

Don’t worry about it. On Area P’s dyno, the B-King produced a hair under 160 rear-wheel horsepower with that 9,500 rpm rev limit. That compares to 168 hp for the ’Busa at 11,000.
More to the point, the B-King produces just under 97 pound-feet of torque. That’s indistinguishable from its streamlined brother, especially considering that you have no reason to rev either motor out.
The impression created on the street is one of seamless, limitless power in almost any gear at any speed. Although the shape of the horsepower and torque curves are the same right up to the B-King’s lower rev limit, it feels even more potent than a Hayabusa off the bottom. I knew the internal gear ratios were the same, but I called Suzuki to ask if the B-King had different final drive gearing, which might have accounted for the difference in the readings from my seat-of-the-pants dyno.
“No,” I was told, “both bikes are 18-43 (teeth at the countershaft and rear sprocket.)”
“Maybe the B-King is lighter, then?” I asked hopefully. But I learned it’s actually a bit heavier.


All I can conclude is that the ’Busa’s sportier riding position masks that torque, and that the B-King’s upright stance exaggerates it a little. Whatever the case, on a long and unobstructed freeway on-ramp, the B-King pulls like a pit bull that’s just realized Fifi the poodle is in heat, somewhere just upwind.
On the freeway, an indicated 80 mph in top gear shows 4,000 rpm on the tach. The bike has top-gear roll-on performance that compares to a lot of bikes’ fourth-gear stomp, so passing is effortless. At that cruising speed, the B-King has the best wind protection ever for a naked bike. I don’t know how stylist Satoshi Isokari did it, because the headlight and clocks seem, if anything, lower than other naked bikes. But somehow, I experienced less wind noise, buffeting and neck strain than I did when I recently rode a partly-faired BMW K1200R Sport.
At that speed, the handlebars transmitted no vibrations at all. There was the slightest buzz every now and then from the seat or pegs, as different components came in and out of phase. The mirrors were the only place that seemed to resonate most of the time, although their position was good; overall, the rearward visibility was still average. (The concept bike had a rear-facing camera and little television built into the tank, which wouldn’t have been any better!) In any case, there’s no reason you should ever be caught from behind on this bike.
To the right of the ignition slot is the drive-mode selector, which offers an A or B choice only. If you’re familiar with the A-B-C choice on the GSX-Rs, note that the B-King really offers something more like A and C. That is to say, in B mode, it peaks at 114 hp. Frankly, I didn’t try it. The throttle is so easy to modulate, that I don’t think I’d remember to hit the switch even in the rain.
The ’Busa-derived motor had big respect going in, so the power was expected, and the functional ergos were a nice surprise. The B-King’s handling though… that’s almost a shock.
The frame and suspension are unique to the B-King; Suzuki didn’t just take the fairing off the ’Busa and slap a wide bar on it. The frame itself – a high-tech, variable-thickness casting job – looks like something that would support a bridge. I guess I should say that the Kayaba fork and shock are “adjustable,” since the term “fully adjustable” now probably implies separate high- and low-speed compression damping. For the record, the available adjustments are spring preload, and compression and rebound damping. There’s no easy way to adjust ride height at the rear.

Still nowhere near the limits of the sticky Dunlop Qualifiers. The B-King is neutral and confidence-inspiring on technical roads, which might be the highest praise of all.

Considering that the bike’s a little longer and heavier than the Hayabusa, with a longer swingarm and more rake and trail, it’s amazingly light on its feet. The wide handlebar is perfectly positioned for good leverage, but there’s more to it than that. A lot of upright bikes don’t really give you a way to exploit that leverage, because you can’t ‘lock’ your body in position the way you can when you have rear-set footpegs to push against. So if you wrench on the ’bar, some of your steering input is wasted when your body moves on the seat.

The uniquely styled B-King puts the funky in functional.

"If I was looking for a streetbike, that (B-King) would be high up on my list.”
Take a second look at that comically wide-shouldered tank/airbox area. Those air intakes are just styling elements, and the whole bodywork assembly is so wide that they can mount the turn signals on it. Since I like to put as much weight on the front as I can, I always sit as far forward as I can, which means that on the B-King, I’m almost doing the splits around the tank. But what that does is, it locks my body in position. As a result, I can really work the handlebar, and it makes the bike a lot more responsive than I expected it would be.
That’s not just my impression, either. “I thought that canyon roads would reveal the B-King to be a wallowing sow,” MO staffer Pete Brissette notes. “Not so. I was excited to discover that rolling the bike through a series of turns was as effortless and precise as the handling offered by any good sportbike available today. The chassis is stout, with well-sorted suspension, front and rear.”
The whole process of getting this big, powerful bike slowed, turned, and then accelerating through and out of a corner works. The transmission shifts perfectly; the clutch pull is light – very light, considering the power it has to transmit – and it is a slipper type so there’s no wheel hop if your throttle-blipping skills are uneven.
A conventional master cylinder actuates radial-mount Tokico calipers grabbing 310mm discs. The initial bite is good, with great strength and feel for trail-braking. The 43mm Kayaba fork (and shock) strike a good compromise between comfort and control. Dunlop Qualifier tires – which can almost be too quick to turn on bikes with sharper geometry – help the bike change direction. Once it’s leaned over, the excellent fuel mapping ensures a smooth throttle take-up, which is reassuring with so much torque at low rpm! And of course, once you’ve got it back on the fat part of the tire, there’s all the power you dare use.
I wish I could get this thing to a track day. My friend Chris Van Andel, who works for Motion Pro and is a partner in the Zoom Zoom track-day business up in NorCal told me, “I rode one at Thunder Hill. It’s rad, and handles better than anything that size has a right to. Then, you pull the pin down the front straight and it’s Millennium Falcon hyperspace time. If I was looking for a streetbike, that (B-King) would be high up on my list.”
Speaking of 'high' that massive underseat exhaust raises the passenger seat up, too. The Chick used my footpeg to climb up onto it, since the passenger peg was high, too. Once in position, she found the seat better than average (she’s used to sportbikes) and she commented on the bike’s smoothness and surprising lack of wind buffeting. I was pleasantly surprised by predictable slow-speed handling even with a passenger perched way up there.

Relatively roomy ergos make the B-King usable in all kinds of riding environments, even commuting.
It seems funny to even bother commenting on the B-King’s ease of use when poking around town with a passenger on board. Ridden aggressively, the bike’s low- to mid-30 mpg fuel consumption is not good, by motorcycle standards (I got about 40 in normal freeway use), but in most other ways it proved surprisingly versatile and functional as a vehicle.
It’s certainly not cheap, with an MSRP of $12,899. (The ABS version, not tested, is $13,499.) Although the styling takes some getting used to, the overall build quality and fit-and-finish are first rate. The basic architecture of the Hayabusa motor may be a decade old, but it’s a beauty; powerful and almost bulletproof. It’s no accident this is still the king of horsepower shootouts. And the changes that marked its growth to 1340cc brought it fully up to date. The B-King is definitely not some long-in-the-tooth sportbike that’s been stripped of its bodywork and repackaged for around-town riding. I bet Suzuki think of this as their flagship.
Made in the shade. When you’ve got a bike like this, you don’t need a paper hat to make you smile.For comparison purposes, the Triumph Speed Triple is less at $10,399; the BMW K1200R is more at $13,920; and if you can get one any time soon, I’m guessing you’ll pay the full list price of $17,990 for an ’09 V-Max.
Despite my initial skepticism and that cartoonish first impression, I now highly recommend the Suzuki B-King – especially to big guys, who aren’t comfortable riding crotch rockets with their heels touching their asses and their knees in their armpits. You can cruise on it, surprise a lot of people in the canyons, commute, and stare down anyone at any red light anywhere.
I could go on, but I have to go. Amazingly, considering I’m riding a bike that approaches 580 pounds (full of fuel) I hear Mount Palomar calling…

(http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/suzuki/2008-suzuki-bking-review-86869.html)


need an extra income? this must be the best place for you just visit http://www.dataentryjobs.us/73147.html

<

2010 Suzuki RMX450Z Review

2010 Suzuki RMX450Z



Suzuki had a lot of success off-road over a decade ago with its RM-250 based RMX. Over the years the RM evolved, but the RMX became watered down. Suzuki off-road racers, and even their own factory team, instead modified RMs to race between the trees. The RMX was subsequently dropped.
Suzuki instead went the four-stroke route with the DR-Z 250 and 400. Both were solid trail bikes, but were too heavy and old fashioned to be competitive without spending a fortune on modifications. Serious off-road customers ignored them and continued modifying RM 125s and 250s for off-road racing. The release of the all-new RMX450 raised a ton of questions. Would it be a fat trail bike like a DRZ400? Would it be a ‘soft’ motocross bike, more suited to GNCC racing than fun weekend trail rides? Despite high demand for the new machine Suzuki dragged its feet getting the RMX to dealerships. We were glad to finally receive our test bike and answer those questions once and for all!



The RMX is indeed pretty much an RM-Z450. The fuel injected 450 engine is based on the motocross version, albeit with milder cams, some EPA mandated intake and exhaust neutering, and the prerequisite electric starter. The transmission ratios are wider than the RM-Z, but still reasonable for singletrack and moto use. The frame is based on the 2009 RM-Z frame, which Suzuki factory test riders preferred over the 2010 RM-Z frame for its flex characteristics.
The suspension components are the same as the RM-Z, just with more off-road appropriate valving and spring rates. Compared to the typical Japanese ‘enduro’ bike the RMX is a very serious offering. Going by specs alone you can tell Suzuki was targeting serious weekend trail riders who like to mix up their woods rides with some motocross and cross-country seat time. Sounds good so far!
The teeny weeny aluminum gas tank seems out of place on an off-road bike, but we like it. Sort of.
Everything on the bike is tucked in well – it has a skid plate, radiator overflow tank, a back up kickstarter, a quick access airbox, minimal lighting and a kickstand. It’s even got a digital trip meter with a low fuel light. The bike shares the same small alloy fuel tank as the RM-Z. The Internet is full of people crying about the bike’s short range. That depends on how you use the bike. On the East Coast, and with the proliferation of ‘new school’ enduros with gas stops closely spaced together, the gas tank size might be a non-issue. We loved the slim ergos and think they are well worth the trade-off in trail riding range…sort of. We got around 30 miles to a tank of fuel, riding hard. Thankfully the aftermarket is working on bigger tanks for the cross-country and trail-riding crowd.
Anyway, all the enduro gear added a lot of weight to the RMX. It’s about the same weight as other bloated enduro four-strokes, 272.3 pounds. That’s about 25 pounds heavier than the RM-Z motocrosser. Some of that weight can be carved off quite easily for racing, and the battery and electric starter can be even removed without affecting the operation of the engine or fuel injection system. The RMX kick starts pretty easily too, so maybe that isn’t as silly an idea as it sounds.
The RMX is choked up, big time. Lose the EPA stuff and it becomes a different bike, but it also gets loud and technically illegal to operate on public land.
What’s it like to ride? Our shorter test riders loved the general feel of the RMX. It also turns well, with the tradeoff being questionable high-speed stability. That’s a Suzuki trait that drives some riders crazy, but it’s one that we can live with. The fork is awesome, generating zero complaints. The shock was a little confused, feeling like it needed stiffer overall valving. Our 160-pound intermediate ended up stiffening the rebound and compression to get the back end to quit wallowing.
Like most EFI dirt bikes dead engine electric starts take a few revolutions. We found it much faster off the line just to kick start it. In choked-off EPA form the bike is also slow. It won’t wheelie in third without using the clutch, it won’t rev out, it flames out and runs really hot. With the EPA stuff in place the flywheel feels too light and the bike feels like it’s geared too tall. It drove us nuts! Our bike didn’t have the half-throttle stop the U.S bikes use to meet EPA specs, but it did have the pencil sized exhaust tip and sealed up airbox. We brought it home, read reports online saying the bike won’t run right without that EPA stuff, and then we took it off anyway.

For a 450 enduro bike the RMX feels surprisingly agile.

Results? Instant transformation! The bike did unfortunately become about as loud as the motocross version, which isn’t exactly obnoxious but is still too loud to be politically correct. Despite what we’d read our bike didn’t run noticeably lean in our humid 85-degree weather with the exhaust and intake unplugged. There are aftermarket gizmos to add to the wiring harness which richen the EFI settings if you find the need. We didn’t.
Good bike. Would it be competitive with a KTM 450EXC or Husqvarna TE 450? Totally! In some ways it may even be a little better.
The uncorked, ‘closed course only’ RMX now ran like a real 450 should. A torquey, powerful and very smooth 450! The gearing and flywheel weight suddenly felt just right, throttle response was crisp and power wheelies in any gear were possible. It never stalled or boiled after we uncorked it, and we actually preferred the smooth power delivery of the milder RMX to that of the motocross version.
Play hard. The RMX is a solid hit for the weekend warrior crowd.We didn’t have time to unbolt the other stuff that weighed it down, but the potential of the RMX to become a winning off-road race bike is very real. You can feel the weight of the highly placed battery, but the bike is light on its feet for a 270-pound enduro machine.
Stuff we didn’t like? The airbox is quick to access but it is very difficult to get the filter element itself in and out. We took off the seat and peeked in with a flashlight just to be confident the filter was seated properly. The bike is too slow when corked up and too loud when it’s uncorked. We’d love to try it with an Akrapovic or FMF-Q silencer, guessing it would be a great compromise.


So what do we think? When uncorked the RMX jumped up to the position of our favorite 450 of the year, solely for its ability to do just about anything well. It turns great, it’s fun to play on and will run pretty hard on a MX track without being too unruly for the forest. But if we were casual trail riders used to typically fluffy Japanese trail bikes, or long distance adventure trail riders, the RMX wouldn’t rate so highly. This is an all-around fun, competent motorcycle with a ton of untapped potential. That’s good with us!

(http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/suzuki/2010-suzuki-rmx450z-review-89680.html)


need an extra income? this must be the best place for you just visit http://www.dataentryjobs.us/73147.html

<

2011 Suzuki GSX-R750 Review




Does a middleweight sportbike powered by a carbureted, air/oil-cooled engine with a claimed 106 crank horsepower spinning a slim 140 x 70/18 rear tire sound exciting? If it was 1985, and the above mystery bike’s color scheme is blue and white, then it was the Suzuki GSX-R750 that would’ve had you geeked.
A Gixxer 750 with 106 ponies. How times have changed.
The GSX-R750 – arguably the bike that started the replica racer revolution – marked its 25th anniversary in 2010. Oddly, Suzuki decided to celebrate the noteworthy birthday last year by creating a limited edition GSX-R1000, designated by little more than special paint and “25th Anniversary Edition” on the mufflers and wheel rim striping.
For us in the States, 1986 was the first time we could zip down the road on a Gixxer, so this year is something of an unofficial 25th anniversary for the 750 in America. Thankfully, we at least have an upgraded and lighter weight GSX-R750 in 2011 to celebrate with – even if we’re the only ones partying.



The 2011 GSX-R750: The Sixxer’s Burlier Twin Brother
Suzuki revised the 750 and 600 at the same time, with the 750 getting virtually all the goodies with which the 600 was endowed. Full details on the Gixxer’s 2011 changes can be seen in our preview article.

The bigger Gixxer’s engine, like the 600’s, now has pentagonal ventilation holes to help reduce power losses from crankcase pressure. Additional shared updates include revised cam profiles, hardened connecting rods, improved crank pin bearing and new starter motor. Otherwise, the 750’s engine is mostly the same as the previous model.

Visually, it’s difficult to discern between a 600 and 750.
Key but subtle indicators you’re looking at a GSX-R750 are black wheels (white on the 600), slightly less busy decal scheme on the Blue/White color, and the number 750 on the tail section. Beyond that, good luck picking out a 750 in a crowd of GSX-R600s.
It’s been a few years since I last rode a GSX-R750, but blitzing through the first lap on the Barber Motorsports Park road course, the bigger Gixxer’s extra displacement made it clear I was no longer on the 600. With a claimed 148 hp and 20 fewer pounds to hustle around this year, the 750’s meaty mid-range is especially appreciable when digging out of slower-speed corners.
In the GSX-R600 review I said the supersport’s newfound mid-range torque allows a rider to sometimes run one gear higher than he or she might normally when exiting turns. The 750’s extra grunt leaves little question as to whether or not it can pull the higher gear on corner exit.

Lots of folks subscribe to the mantra that there’s no replacement for displacement. While there’s some credence to that philosophy, the Gixxer 750 does have something of a hidden liability within its engine – especially notable when ridden back-to-back against the GSX-R600. Although the 750’s curb weight is a scant 7.0 pounds more than the 600’s 412-pound ready-to-ride weight, the 750’s few extra pounds are found mostly in its engine, according to Suzuki staff.
“Big whoop,” you say, “who could tell the difference?”
You’re right. You probably couldn’t sense the narrow gap in wet weights – except when the 750’s mill is revving and spinning. Through the magic of physics the 750’s unfortunate but nevertheless necessary extra pounds are noticeably magnified, as they’re not static pounds, but instead are manifest as rotating mass of the crank.
Along with the 750’s additional rotating weight that compels it to keep moving forward in a straight line, its BPF (Big Piston Fork) also has firmer compression damping settings than what the 600’s BPF uses. This heavier, firmer, combination means the 750 doesn’t necessarily flick in to turns with the same feathery steering compliance found in the GSX-R600.
The 750’s handling, despite the heavier steering effort, is still a strong weapon in this bike’s arsenal. Overall chassis stability and suspension feedback on the 750 are also are quite good, just as on the 600.



Suzuki’s rider-selectable engine mapping (S-DMS) is also updated on the 750, now consisting of just A and B modes. Just as Suzuki widened the gap in power between the two settings on the supersport 600, with B mode a tick softer than C mode in the previous S-DMS, the same principle was applied to the 2011 750.
However, the new 750’s power delivery in B mode is considerably softer than what C mode delivered on the previous model according to power graph overlays provided by Suzuki. Regardless, the new 750’s B mode is likely still more powerful, if even by a few horsepower, when compared to 600’s full power setting.
Conclusion
The 750cc supersport class is held captive by the Gixxer, as no other manufacturer produces a sporting, race-derived machine with an inline-Four in this displacement. The Gixxer 750 remains a lonely king.
Now that I’ve ridden both the 600 and 750 ‘round the racetrack, the 600 better suits my tastes for track time – primarily for its lighter-effort steering.



However, for the rider that desires a top-performing sportbike for everyday street use, with the occasional trackday here and there, the extra horsepower and mid-range pulling power the 750 offers are enticing.
And when you consider the 2011 GSX-R750’s MSRP of $11,999 is only $400 more than the GSX-R600’s price tag, the bigger Gixxer is a compelling package for anyone enraptured with the idea of owning the best inline-Four middleweight sportbike around.

(http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/suzuki/2011-suzuki-gsxr750-review-90529.html)


need an extra income? this must be the best place for you just visit http://www.dataentryjobs.us/73147.html

<

2011 Suzuki GSX1250FA Review

2011 Suzuki GSX1250RA



A new motorcycle with sporting intentions but absent ground-breaking technology or a race-winning pedigree is easily overlooked. Enter the 2011 GSX1250FA, a semi-new model from Suzuki lacking advertising superlatives but delivering the essential qualities that comprise a competent motorcycle, i.e., performance and fun at an affordable price.
The Suzuki GSX1250FA is the bike a discerning motorcyclist will pick out of a line-up of overly specialized sportbikes or portly sport-tourers emphasizing the latter part of the compound title. Besides its standard equipment anti-lock brakes, the GSX1250FA is elemental in its construction and built to be ridden anywhere, anytime by a motorcyclist who values versatility over hyperbole.
Stripped of its Bandit moniker, in use since the Bandit 400’s U.S. introduction in 1991, the GSX1250FA also differs from its predecessor by way of full-fairing cosmetics. Less obvious upgrades include heavier fork springs and firmer rebound damping, and an additional radiator fan to compensate for the loss of airflow from the full-coverage bodywork.

Albeit the changes are minor, the bike’s new plastic-clad profile should generate interest from motorcyclists familiar with the previously naked or quarter-faired versions as well as those without knowledge of the GSX’s past nomenclature. And when those who previously dismissed the Bandit get a chance to test the GSX1250, they’re gonna be surprised by the bike’s well-mannered, universal performance.
2011 Suzuki GSX1250RAThe GSX1250FA’s engine is certainly one of the bike’s best qualities. With maximum torque at a V-Twin rpm (72.3 lb.-ft. at just 3,500) the GSX romps out of corners with a robustness that belies its modest 92.6 hp at 8,800 rpm dyno figure. The abundance of low-end power augments real-world usability and ensures you’re never left wanting when running a gear high or in need of emergency passing power. It should be noted, however, that as pleasurable and user-friendly as the fuel-injected 1255cc inline-Four is, considering its displacement, we were hoping for at least triple-digit horsepower numbers.
A surprising attribute of the GSX1250FA is its handling prowess, especially considering its low-tech tubular steel frame and 567-lb curb weight. It’s no Jenny Craig poster child, but in the canyons the GSX manages its weight well and will easily keep on the rear wheel of faster, lighter bikes piloted by lesser riders. Competitive models such as the new Kawasaki Ninja 1000 and Yamaha FZ1 are lighter and better handling, but without these bikes playing devil’s advocate, a GSX1250FA operator will be riding in ignorant bliss of the bike’s weight problem.
As capable as the GSX is in the canyons, it’s equally at home digesting freeway miles in commuter mode or during long-distance road trips. Ergonomics are comfortable with plenty of seat-to-footpeg legroom and a moderate reach to the superbike handlebars. The suspension is well-balanced on the plusher side for extended seat-time comfort. It’s only in the canyons, during aggressive braking and cornering, when the bike’s weight occasionally overwhelms the suspension, but otherwise the bike’s 43mm fork and single rear shock keep the GSX composed.
2011 Suzuki GSX1250RA
Throttle response from Suzuki’s Dual Throttle Valve fuel-injection system is faultless, delivering smooth controllable application of power at any rpm, and a stout clutch offers a wide engagement zone for smooth launches. The GSX’s triple-disc brakes provide a very firm lever and decent feedback to slow the GSX with confidence. Adjustable brake and clutch levers fit a variety of hand sizes.
2011 Suzuki GSX1250RAThe GSX’s ABS system is the bike’s most advanced technological component, but unless an emergency situation arises it’s a system that runs unnoticed in the background. I did pound the brakes a couple times to confirm the existence of the system was more than just stickers on the front fender. The system sends a familiar pulsating sensation through the levers when activated, but will stop the bike with authority. Equipped with ABS as standard, the GSX1250FA stands apart in its category.
For those with a penchant for traveling, the new full-fairing provides more protection from the elements than the old quarter-faired Bandit. However, we deemed the bike’s styling more reminiscent of an aftermarket lower cowl back-ordered from the late 1990s than a cutting-edge 2011 model. From the front, the GSX-R-derived stacked headlight is much more in vogue. Gusts coming over the windscreen hit my 5-foot-11 frame about mid-chest in a clean, non-turbulent flow of air. Suzuki also offers a more touring-oriented windscreen as well as a 37-liter top box and hard, lockable and detachable saddlebags, which can morph the GSX into a sporty big sport-touring rig.
The seat of the GSX1250FA provides a two-position height adjustment, altering from 31.7 to 32.5 inches, but changing over the seat tray to a different level is the most complicated processes of seat height adjustment we’ve ever encountered. You’ll want to pick the most appropriate level and leave the seat in that position.
Besides the child-proof seat, the GSX does possess two rarities a lot of future owners will respect. The first one is a centerstand. Yes, it adds a little weight and can limit cornering clearance when the bike is loaded with a passenger and gear, but this apparatus is essential for lubing and adjusting a chain whenever you’re away from home.
2011 Suzuki GSX1250RA
The other nicety is a pair of helmet locks located under the seat. I don’t know why manufacturers are leaving this simple addition off a lot modern motorcycles, but I’m tired of having to carry my helmet into a restaurant when it would be perfectly safe attached to the bike. Thank you, Suzuki, for using common sense and including this function on the GSX1250FA.
2011 Suzuki GSX1250RAThe instrument cluster is clean and easy to read, and it includes a handy digital gear-indicator window, another feature absent on similar models.
Carrying an MSRP of $11,599, the GSX1250FA is a bargain, especially considering ABS is included in this price. If you’re in the market for a new motorcycle that slots between a dedicated sport-tourer and a sporty standard, the GSX1250FA should be on your list of considerations. Its best selling point is its engine that delivers locomotive-like power when and where you need it, and its handling easily exceeded our expectations.
So if you can swing a test ride from your local dealer, give the GSX a chance. You’ll probably be as pleasantly surprised as we were.
2011 Suzuki GSX1250RA

(http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/suzuki/2011-suzuki-gsx1250fa-review-90847.html)

2012 Suzuki V-Strom 650 ABS Preview

062611-2012-suzuki-v-strom-650-abs-DL650AL2_Diagonal_YVB.jpg


After a slow trickle of information from a series of teasers to last week’s deluge from an apparently accident leak, Suzuki has officially unveiled its updated 2012 V-Strom 650 ABS.
Initial reaction on the blogosphere to last week’s leak was rather tepid. After several teasers hinting at a “new middle-class motorcycle”, many expected Suzuki to introduce a dramatically changed new V-Strom, perhaps somewhere in the 800cc segment to compete against the new Triumph Tiger 800 and the BMW F800GS.
Proclaiming it “time for real adventures”, Suzuki’s teaser campaign hinted at something more off-road oriented than the previous Wee-Strom. The reality turned out to something still better suited to pavement than dirt.
062611-2012-suzuki-v-strom-650-abs-V_image_6.jpg
When the first images and specs emerged, the perception was the 2012 Suzuki V-Strom 650 was, as the cliché goes, more evolutionary than revolutionary. But perhaps that isn’t such a bad thing. The previous V-Strom 650 was a very capable machine, powered by the well-received engine inherited from the Suzuki SV650 and SFV650 Gladius.
062611-2012-suzuki-v-strom-650-abs-Engine_CEOR.jpgThe fuel-injected engine on the 2012 Suzuki V-Strom has the same bore and stroke as the previous version (81.0mm x 62.6mm), but it has been updated with new pistons, piston rings and cylinders. According to Suzuki, the updated engine offers higher torque at low-to-mid revs, thanks to a modified cam profile, as well as more horsepower at the high end.
Suzuki also claims a 10% improvement in fuel economy, allowing for a slimmer, lighter fuel tank with a capacity of 5.3 gallons from 5.8 gallons. Claiming a curb weight of 472 pounds, the 2012 V-Strom ABS is about 13 pounds lighter than the 2011 version.
The new V-Strom uses the same aluminum twin-spar frame and swingarm as the previous model. The front suspension uses 43mm telescopic forks with five spring preload adjustments and 150mm of stroke. The rear suspension also offers adjustable spring preload, with fine adjustments made with a knob located under the frame cover on the right side.
Like the 2011 model, the V-Strom 650 will only be available with ABS. According to Suzuki, the ABS components are lighter and more compact on the 2012 model, weighing 1.5 pounds, less than half the previous ABS system’s 3.3 pounds.
062611-2012-suzuki-v-strom-650-abs-Strip_RightSide_CHJY.jpg
The seat on the 2012 V-Strom 650 is new, with an embossed logo and red stitching. At 32.9 inches, the standard seat sits 0.6 inches higher than on the previous version, which, according to Suzuki, reduces rider fatigue for long-distance riding. For riders with longer or shorter legs, Suzuki is offering a couple of optional seats that are change the seat height to either 33.7 inches or 32.1 inches.
062611-2012-suzuki-v-strom-650-abs-Seat.jpg
062611-2012-suzuki-v-strom-650-abs-FuelTank.jpg
Design-wise, the new Wee-Strom is slimmer than the previous version. The narrower tank helps make it easier to put your feet down despite the higher seat, while the previous version’s side plastics have been replaced by black resin air outlets, a change intended to improve cooling and provide better wind protection. The windscreen offers three adjustable settings, with the upper edge in the default setting 30mm set back from the 2011 model’s windscreen.
Behind the seat, Suzuki replaced the aluminum rear carrier and passenger grab handles with a lighter black resin components that are lighter and less affected by ambient temperature.
Another update is the new instrument panel with an analog tachometer and brightness-adjustable LCD display. The LCD screen displays a gear indicator, fuel gauge, ambient temperature and odometer/trip meter/fuel consumption. The tachometer also features a coolant and oil temperature warning and a road freeze warning that lights up when the road temperature approaches freezing.
The 2012 V-Strom 650 will be produced in three colors, though only two will be offered in the U.S. American consumers can choose between Metallic Fox Orange and Glass Sparkle Black while other markets will be offered the Pearl Mirage White.
The 2012 Suzuki V-Strom 650 ABS will arrive in American dealerships in November, though pricing remains to be determined. Suzuki will also offer a number of accessories, though the North American offerings have yet to be finalized.


(http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/suzuki/2012-suzuki-vstrom-650-abs-preview-91063.html)